psychoviper wrote:
Where to start? These things look like Tonka toys, not Joe vehicles.
Funny, they look like neither construction vehicles nor pick-up trucks.
The Tiger Snake looks like a miniaturized Steel Monster, though, but I don't see how that's a negative thing.
Quote:
Clunky, lack of details, lack of features,
Seems detailed enough. The plow in front is loaded with details, there's rivets molded on across the toy, an actual seat and steering wheel, not to mention the rear tire is rubber. As for lack of features, it has a gun and it can roll on its own at high speeds across the floor. How is that not a feature?
Quote:
I think they look like they are targeted at the 4 year old audience.
Well much like every other Joe toy put out in recent year, it
does say "Ages 4+" on the packaging.
Quote:
And the figures are not new.
Considering how inexpensive the toy is, I'm not complaining. The figure is practically a freebie.
Quote:
Honestly, can you picture a cool looking figure on one of these things and say with a straight face that they go together?
Yes. In fact I'm working on an actual Street-Viper to drive it.
Quote:
I would not want these if someone gave them to me free!
Wow, you're really angry at these toys. Did a Rip Attack vehicle push you off your bike when you were a child?
Quote:
If they sell well, that's great for the brand, but it might encourage Hasbro to make more vehicles in this style, which would be sad.
Cheap vehicles with custom fodder figures are awful indeed! They should redeco more vehicles from Spy Troops instead!
Quote:
Although, come to think of it, i haven't bought a Joe vehicle in years. It's PTE all the way for me, baby!
Suburbanator wrote:
Jay, do you have any other pictures of that thing?
No, but I can snap some later tonight.
_________________
Quote:
You're far too young to be this bitter and angry at the world....
